Two ex-Wells Fargo advisors sue over fairness recruiting deal

A recruiting case involving two former Wells Fargo representatives is displaying the dangers advisors run once they settle for recruiting incentives that supply fairness of their new agency somewhat than upfront money.

Rick Fuchs and Graham Heck, each advisors within the Austin, Texas, space, left Wells Fargo in 2020 to affix Steward Companions Funding Advisory, a registered funding advisor with its major places of work in Washington, D.C. A lawsuit filed on Sept. 28 in federal court docket for the Western District of Texas states the pair had been induced to depart partially by a recruiting deal providing them fairness shares in an affiliate firm, Steward Companions Administration Holdings. The authorized motion, first reported by AdvisorHub, seeks unspecified damages for alleged violations of the Securities Act of 1933.

When being recruited in 2019 and 2020, Fuchs and Heck had been supplied shares priced nominatively at $17.50 a bit. Their go well with alleges, although, that they had been repeatedly assured by Steward Companions representatives that the true worth was between $20 and $25 a unit.

Partly for that cause, Fuchs, Heck and 4 different members of their advisory crew determined to maneuver to Steward Companions at first of October 2020. In return, the agency supplied shares to the advisors; Fuchs obtained 118,609 shares. 

At $17.50 a share, his fairness providing was valued at roughly $2 million. However utilizing the $25 a share higher restrict he mentioned was quoted to him by the Steward Companions recruiters, he believed the true worth to be as excessive as practically $3 million, in accordance with the go well with.

Heck equally obtained 31,416 shares ostensibly price $549,780. However on the $25 worth restrict, their precise worth can be $785,400.

The deal started to unravel in December 2021 when the third-party agency Certent issued a report putting the precise worth of the shares at $13.22 a unit. Fuchs and Heck’s lawsuit alleges that such misrepresentations “are half and parcel of Steward’s common enterprise practices.”

READ MORE: Advisory practices aren’t meeting clients’ tax demands, study finds

Makes an attempt to succeed in Steward Companions had been unsuccessful. The agency has mentioned previously that it does not touch upon authorized disputes as a matter of coverage.

A pair of business recruiters agreed the case reveals that advisors typically don’t totally admire the dangers that include recruiting offers that supply fairness somewhat than money. Jody Papike, the CEO and managing partner of Cross-Search, mentioned it is all the time sensible for planners to seek the advice of a lawyer or skilled any time they’re considering of coming into into a brand new contract. That is very true, she mentioned, for offers providing shares within the agency they’re becoming a member of.

Pitfalls to look out for, she mentioned, embrace clawback clauses that permit the agency to recoup a few of its recruitment incentives and noncompete clauses that may forestall advisors from soliciting former shoppers in the event that they ultimately depart for a competitor. Papike mentioned advisors also needs to remember that fairness choices normally solely improve in worth if the agency does properly.

“So your future is not essentially primarily based in your particular person efficiency,” she mentioned. “It is primarily based on the whole group’s efficiency.”

Phil Waxelbaum, the founder and CEO of Masada Consulting, agreed {that a} marketing consultant or lawyer must be tapped to look over any fairness deal advisors are considering of taking. Waxelbaum mentioned the difficulty with fairness is that its true worth is commonly obscure. Planners ought to all the time ask how shares are being priced and whether or not there are any restrictions on taking their cash out.

Additionally they, Waxelbaum mentioned, ought to search to make sure there are provisions that forestall their employer from issuing extra shares in a manner that may dilute the worth of their very own fairness.

“If there isn’t a anti-dilution provision, it is a dangerous deal,” Waxelbaum mentioned.

Robert Linkin, a associate on the Dallas-based agency Munck Wilson Mandala who’s representing Fuchs and Heck, declined to remark.

READ MORE: Franklin Templeton CEO on the ‘unintended consequences’ from interest rate hikes

In keeping with their go well with, Steward Companions started complaining in January 2022 that Fuchs and Heck’s crew was not doing properly sufficient to assist its recruitment bundle — regardless that that deal was by no means meant to be tied to efficiency. “Apparently in a money crunch,” the go well with states, Steward Companions referred to as the pair into a gathering and advised them they had been fired.

Fuchs and Heck later reestablished their employment solely by agreeing to pay again two-thirds of their shares in Steward in addition to $1 million from a signing bonus they’d obtained on becoming a member of the agency, in accordance with the go well with. Each Fuchs and Heck have since left Steward Companions and at the moment are registered with LPL Monetary.